The settlement leaves several important issues unresolved, we believe. Notably, the secondary ticketing issue remains unsettled. Ticketmaster has signaled that it intends to use questionable "innovations" such as paperless ticketing to extend its monopoly power over the secondary market. We believe that this may constitute an unfair and deceptive trade practice. We therefore urge the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) to maintain a watchful eye and ensure that consumers continue to benefit from a robust secondary market.While today's decision is not the strongest in terms of protecting consumers, competition, and choice in the industry, it is all the more reason why consumers should continue to stand up and voice their concerns with this live entertainment monopoly," said Gary Adler, counsel to the National Association of Ticket Brokers. "The fight is not over. Our efforts to protect the rights of the consumer by exposing Ticketmaster's anti-consumer activities, including the use of paperless ticketing and excessive fees, are still priority number one.
"It's like having your own little burger restaurant, and then asking McDonald's to come in and help you," he said. But that doesn't mean independent companies can't thrive by exploring alternative technologies and ticketing Web sites. There are still plenty of options for those working on a small scale, he said."Now it's up to us to think about different ways to get around these people," - Billy O'Brien, Independant Promoter